- Sioux Falls, S.D.
- Fort Collins, Colo.
- Chattanooga, Tenn. (21.4% better than the national average)
- Cedar Rapids, Iowa
- Knoxville, Tenn. (19% better than the national average)
- Fort Wayne, Ind.
- Lexington-Fayette, Ky.
- Eugene, Ore.
- Boise, Idaho
- Colorado Springs, Colo
After driving here for five months I have to come to the conclusion that either (a) Tennesse drivers are less likely to get into accidents but not neccesarily due to safer driving* or (b) I really have no idea how bad the rest of the country drives.
Minneapolis and St. Paul come in at 39 (4.5% better than the national average) and 41 (3.6% better than the national average), respectively.
P.S. As I was looking for something regarding methodology on the study. The L.A. Times calls it an "in-depth analysis." Allstate says:
Uh huh. I am leaning towards option a above...The Allstate Best Drivers Report is produced solely to boost the country’s discussion about safe driving and to increase awareness of the importance of being tolerant and attentive behind the wheel. The report is not used to determine auto insurance rates.
*E.g., safer driving conditions could be a factor.
1 comment:
"E.g., safer driving conditions could be a factor."
Yep. Does not account at all for the fact that people from the sticks suck at driving in any sort of traffic.
Post a Comment